参考文献

1. Agarwal, S., Krueger, G., Clark, J., Radford, A., Kim, J. W., & Brundage, M. (2021). Evaluating CLIP: Towards Characterization of Broader Capabilities and Downstream Implications (arXiv:2108.02818). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2108.02818

2. Ali, J., Kleindessner, M., Wenzel, F., Budhathoki, K., Cevher, V., & Russell, C. (2023). Evaluating the Fairness of Discriminative Foundation Models in Computer Vision. Proceedings of the 2023 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, 809–833. https://doi.org/10.1145/3600211.3604720

3. Andreessen, M. (2023, October 16). The techno-optimist manifesto. Andreessen Horowitz. https://a16z.com/the-techno-optimist-manifesto/

4. Angwin, J., Larson, J., Mattu, S., & Kirchner, L. (2016, May 23). Machine Bias. Propublica. https://www.propublica.org/article/machine-bias-risk-assessments-in-criminal-sentencing

5. Baack, S., & Mozilla Insights. (2024). Training Data for the Price of a Sandwich: Common Crawl’s Impact on Generative AI. https://foundation.mozilla.org/en/research/library/generative-ai-training-data/common-crawl/

6. Bach, J. (2023, February 26). Joscha Bach: Open Sourcing AI & it’s implications (C. Schuhmann, Interviewer) [Interview]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MVm9FVfGrFQ

7. Bagdasaryan, E., & Shmatikov, V. (2019). Differential Privacy Has Disparate Impact on Model Accuracy (arXiv:1905.12101). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1905.12101

8. Beaumont, R. (2022, March 31). A Call to Protect Open-Source AI in Europe. LAION. https://laion.ai/notes/letter-to-the-eu-parliament

9. Beaumont, R. (2022, March 31). Laion-5B: A New Era of Open Large-Scale Multi-Modal Datasets. LAION. https://laion.ai/blog/laion-5b

10. Bennett, C. L., Gleason, C., Scheuerman, M. K., Bigham, J. P., Guo, A., & To, A. (2021). “It’s Complicated”: Negotiating Accessibility and (Mis)Representation in Image Descriptions of Race, Gender, and Disability. Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445498

11. Bianchi, F., Kalluri, P., Durmus, E., Ladhak, F., Cheng, M., Nozza, D., Hashimoto, T., Jurafsky, D., Zou, J., & Caliskan, A. (2023). Easily Accessible Text-to-Image Generation Amplifies Demographic Stereotypes at Large Scale. 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 1493–1504. https://doi.org/10.1145/3593013.3594095

12. Bigham, J. P., Kaminsky, R. S., Ladner, R. E., Danielsson, O. M., & Hempton, G. L. (2006). WebInSight: Making Web Images Accessible. Proceedings of the 8th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, 181–188. https://doi.org/10.1145/1168987.1169018

13. Bommasani, R., Hudson, D. A., Adeli, E., Altman, R., Arora, S., von Arx, S., Bernstein, M. S., Bohg, J., Bosselut, A., Brunskill, E., Brynjolfsson, E., Buch, S., Card, D., Castellon, R., Chatterji, N., Chen, A., Creel, K., Davis, J. Q., Demszky, D., … Liang, P. (2022). On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models (arXiv:2108.07258). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2108.07258

14. Brown, T. B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J., Dhariwal, P., Neelakantan, A., Shyam, P., Sastry, G., Askell, A., Agarwal, S., Herbert-Voss, A., Krueger, G., Henighan, T., Child, R., Ramesh, A., Ziegler, D. M., Wu, J., Winter, C., … Amodei, D. (2020). Language Models are Few-Shot Learners (arXiv:2005.14165). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2005.14165

15. Brynjolfsson, E., Li, D., & Raymond, L. (2023). Generative AI at Work (Working Paper 31161). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w31161

16. Buolamwini, J., & Gebru, T. (2018). Gender Shades: Intersectional Accuracy Disparities in Commercial Gender Classification. Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency, 77–91. https://proceedings.mlr.press/v81/buolamwini18a.html

17. Cai, K., & Martin, I. (2024, March 29). How Stability AI’s Founder Tanked His Billion-Dollar Startup. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/kenrickcai/2024/03/29/how-stability-ais-founder-tanked-his-billion-dollar-startup/

18. Castells, M. (2010). The Rise of the Network Society (2nd edition). Wiley-Blackwell.

19. Chun, W. H. K. (with Barnett, A.). (2021). Discriminating Data: Correlation, Neighborhoods, and the New Politics of Recognition. The MIT Press.

20. Chung, J. J. Y., Kim, W., Yoo, K. M., Lee, H., Adar, E., & Chang, M. (2022). TaleBrush: Sketching Stories with Generative Pretrained Language Models. CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3501819

21. Collins, E., & Wang, M. (2025). Federated Learning: A Survey on Privacy-Preserving Collaborative Intelligence (arXiv:2504.17703). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2504.17703

22. Crawford, K., & Joler, V. (2018). Anatomy of an AI System: The Amazon Echo as an Anatomical Map of Human Labor, Data and Planetary Resources. https://anatomyof.ai/

23. Crawford, K. (2022). Atlas of AI: Power, Politics, and the Planetary Costs of Artificial Intelligence. Yale University Press.

24. Dauvergne, P. (2022). Is Artificial Intelligence Greening Global Supply Chains? Exposing the Political Economy of Environmental Costs. Review of International Political Economy, 29(3), 696–718. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2020.1814381

25. Denton, R., Hanna, A., Amironesei, R., Smart, A., Nicole, H., & Scheuerman, M. K. (2020). Bringing the People Back In: Contesting Benchmark Machine Learning Datasets (arXiv:2007.07399). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2007.07399

26. Denton, E., Hanna, A., Amironesei, R., Smart, A., & Nicole, H. (2021). On the genealogy of machine learning datasets: A critical history of ImageNet. Big Data & Society, 8(2), 20539517211035955. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211035955

27. DiBona, C., & Ockman, S. (1999). Open Sources: Voices from the Open Source Revolution (1st edition). O’Reilly Media.

28. Eloundou, T., Manning, S., Mishkin, P., & Rock, D. (2023). GPTs are GPTs: An Early Look at the Labor Market Impact Potential of Large Language Models (arXiv:2303.10130). arXiv. http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.10130

29. Epstein, Z., Levine, S., Rand, D. G., & Rahwan, I. (2020). Who gets credit for AI-generated art? iScience, 23(9), 101515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2020.101515

30. Epstein, Z., Schroeder, H., & Newman, D. (2022). When happy accidents spark creativity: Bringing collaborative speculation to life with generative AI (arXiv:2206.00533). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2206.00533

31. Epstein, Z., Hertzmann, A., Akten, M., Farid, H., Fjeld, J., Frank, M. R., Groh, M., Herman, L., Leach, N., Mahari, R., Pentland, A. “Sandy”., Russakovsky, O., Schroeder, H., Smith, A., & Smith, A. (2023). Art and the science of generative AI. Science, 380(6650), 1110–1111. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adh4451

32. Ferrara, E. (2023). Fairness and bias in artificial intelligence: a brief survey of sources, impacts, and mitigation strategies. Sci, 6(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/sci6010003

33. Ferrari, F. (2023). Neural Production Networks: AI’s Infrastructural Geographies. Environment and Planning F, 2(4), 459–476. https://doi.org/10.1177/26349825231193226

34. Fletcher, R. (2024). How many news websites block AI crawlers? Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. https://doi.org/10.60625/risj-xm9g-ws87

35. Frenkel, S., & Thompson, S. A. (2023, July 15). “Not for Machines to Harvest”: Data Revolts Break Out Against A.I. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/07/15/technology/artificial-intelligence-models-chat-data.html

36. Gadekallu, T. R., Dev, K., Khowaja, S. A., Wang, W., Feng, H., Fang, K., Pandya, S., & Wang, W. (2025). Framework, Standards, Applications and Best practices of Responsible AI : A Comprehensive Survey (arXiv:2504.13979; Version 1). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2504.13979

37. Garg, N., Schiebinger, L., Jurafsky, D., & Zou, J. (2018). Word embeddings quantify 100 years of gender and ethnic stereotypes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(16). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1720347115

38. Gehman, S., Gururangan, S., Sap, M., Choi, Y., & Smith, N. A. (2020). RealToxicityPrompts: Evaluating Neural Toxic Degeneration in Language Models (arXiv:2009.11462). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2009.11462

39. Ghosh, A., & Fossas, G. (2022). Can there be art without an artist? (arXiv:2209.07667). arXiv. http://arxiv.org/abs/2209.07667

40. Gleason, C., Carrington, P., Cassidy, C., Morris, M. R., Kitani, K. M., & Bigham, J. P. (2019). “It’s almost like they’re trying to hide it”: How User-Provided Image Descriptions Have Failed to Make Twitter Accessible. The World Wide Web Conference, 549–559. https://doi.org/10.1145/3308558.3313605

41. Goetze, T. S. (2024). AI Art is Theft: Labour, Extraction, and Exploitation: Or, On the Dangers of Stochastic Pollocks. The 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 186–196. https://doi.org/10.1145/3630106.3658898

42. Goh, G., Cammarata, N., Voss, C., Carter, S., Petrov, M., Schubert, L., Radford, A., & Olah, C. (2021). Multimodal Neurons in Artificial Neural Networks. Distill, 6(3), e30. https://doi.org/10.23915/distill.00030

43. Gordon, S., Mahari, R., Mishra, M., & Epstein, Z. (2022). Co-creation and ownership for AI radio (arXiv:2206.00485). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2206.00485

44. Gorska, A. M., & Jemielniak, D. (2023). The invisible women: uncovering gender bias in AI-generated images of professionals. Feminist Media Studies, 23(8), 4370–4375. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2023.2263659

45. Hanley, M., Barocas, S., Levy, K., Azenkot, S., & Nissenbaum, H. (2021). Computer Vision and Conflicting Values: Describing People with Automated Alt Text. Proceedings of the 2021 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, 543–554. https://doi.org/10.1145/3461702.3462620

46. Heikkilä, M. (2022, September 16). This artist is dominating AI-generated art. And he’s not happy about it. MIT Technology Review. https://www.technologyreview.com/2022/09/16/1059598/this-artist-is-dominating-ai-generated-art-and-hes-not-happy-about-it/

47. Hong, R., Agnew, W., Kohno, T., & Morgenstern, J. (2024). Who’s in and who’s out? A case study of multimodal CLIP-filtering in DataComp. Proceedings of the 4th ACM Conference on Equity and Access in Algorithms, Mechanisms, and Optimization, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1145/3689904.3694702

48. Howard, J. (2023, April 2). Jeremy Howard: His vision for fast.ai & large language models (C. Schuhmann, Interviewer) [Interview]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5DdTjIvd_E

49. 黄孙权 (Ed.). (2017). 让我们平台合作社吧. 网络社会研究所.

50. Hutson, J., & Harper-Nichols, M. (2023). Generative AI and Algorithmic Art: Disrupting the Framing of Meaning and Rethinking the Subject- Object Dilemma. Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology: D, 23(1). https://digitalcommons.lindenwood.edu/faculty-research-papers/461

51. Inflection. (2024, March 19). The new Inflection: An important change to how we’ll work. Inflection. https://inflection.ai/the-new-inflection

52. Jia, C., Yang, Y., Xia, Y., Chen, Y.-T., Parekh, Z., Pham, H., Le, Q. V., Sung, Y., Li, Z., & Duerig, T. (2021). Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervision (arXiv:2102.05918). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2102.05918

53. Kak, A., & West, S. M. (2023). 2023 Landscape: Confronting Tech Power. AI Now Institute. https://ainowinstitute.org/2023-landscape

54. Kaltheuner, F., Saari, L., Kak, A., & West, S. M. (Eds.). (2024). Redirecting Europe’s AI Industrial Policy: From Competitiveness to Public Interest. AI Now Institute. https://ainowinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/AI-Now_EU-AI-Industrial-Policy_Oct.-2024.pdf

55. Kelty, C. M. (2008). Two Bits: The Cultural Significance of Free Software (Illustrated edition). Duke University Press Books. https://twobits.net/

56. Khan, S. M., & Mann, A. (2020). AI Chips: What They Are and Why They Matter. Center for Security and Emerging Technology. https://doi.org/10.51593/20190014

57. Kilcher, Y. (2022, April 22). LAION-5B: 5 billion image-text-pairs dataset (with the authors) (LAION, Interviewer) [Interview]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AIOE1l1W0Tw

58. Kim, J., Lee, J., Jang, K. M., & Lourentzou, I. (2024). Exploring the limitations in how ChatGPT introduces environmental justice issues in the united states: a case study of 3,108 counties. In Telematics and Informatics (Vol. 86). ELSEVIER. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2023.102085

59. Krishna, R., Zhu, Y., Groth, O., Johnson, J., Hata, K., Kravitz, J., Chen, S., Kalantidis, Y., Li, L.-J., Shamma, D. A., Bernstein, M. S., & Li, F.-F. (2016). Visual Genome: Connecting Language and Vision Using Crowdsourced Dense Image Annotations (arXiv:1602.07332). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1602.07332

60. LAION. (2023, April 28). A Call to Protect Open-Source AI in Europe. https://laion.ai/notes/letter-to-the-eu-parliament

61. LAION. (2023, March 29). Petition for keeping up the progress tempo on AI research while securing its transparency and safety. https://laion.ai/blog/petition

62. LAION. (2023, December 19). Safety Review for LAION 5B. LAION. https://laion.ai/notes/laion-maintenance

63. LAION. (2024, August 30). Releasing Re-LAION 5B: transparent iteration on LAION-5B with additional safety fixes. LAION. https://laion.ai/blog/relaion-5b

64. Li, Z., Zhang, W., Zhang, H., Gao, R., & Fang, X. (2024). Global digital compact: a mechanism for the governance of online discriminatory and misleading content generation. In International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction. TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2314350

65. Liesenfeld, A., & Dingemanse, M. (2024). Rethinking open source generative AI: open washing and the EU AI Act. The 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 1774–1787. https://doi.org/10.1145/3630106.3659005

66. Lin, T.-Y., Maire, M., Belongie, S., Bourdev, L., Girshick, R., Hays, J., Perona, P., Ramanan, D., Zitnick, C. L., & Dollár, P. (2015). Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Context (arXiv:1405.0312). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1405.0312

67. Lindgren, S. (2023). Critical Theory of AI (1st edition). Polity. https://www.wiley.com/en-cn/Critical+Theory+of+AI-p-9781509555772

68. Liu, G. (2022, June 21). DALL-E 2 made its first magazine cover. Cosmopolitan. https://www.cosmopolitan.com/lifestyle/a40314356/dall-e-2-artificial-intelligence-cover/

69. 刘雅典. (2023). 生成式人工智能艺术形式与情感关系辨. 文艺争鸣, 2023(7), 77–85.

70. Lu, Z., Huang, D., Bai, L., Qu, J., Wu, C., Liu, X., & Ouyang, W. (2023). Seeing is not always believing: Benchmarking Human and Model Perception of AI-Generated Images. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36, 25435–25447. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2023/hash/505df5ea30f630661074145149274af0-Abstract-Datasets_and_Benchmarks.html

71. Luccioni, A. S., & Viviano, J. D. (2021). What’s in the Box? A Preliminary Analysis of Undesirable Content in the Common Crawl Corpus (arXiv:2105.02732). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2105.02732

72. Ma, D., Song, H., & Thomas, N. (2020). Supply Chain Jigsaw: Piecing Together the Future Global Economy. https://macropolo.org/analysis/supply-chain-ai-semicondutor-lithium-oled-global-economy/

73. Maluleke, V. H., Thakkar, N., Brooks, T., Weber, E., Darrell, T., Efros, A. A., Kanazawa, A., & Guillory, D. (2022). Studying bias in GANs through the lens of race (arXiv:2209.02836). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2209.02836

74. Marcelline, M. (2023, March 26). Microsoft Reportedly Threatens to Restrict Search Data From Rival AI Tools. Pcmag. https://www.pcmag.com/news/microsoft-reportedly-threatens-to-restrict-search-data-from-rival-ai-tools

75. Maslej, N., Fattorini, L., Parli, V., Reuel, A., Brynjolfsson, E., Etchemendy, J., Ligett, K., Lyons, T., Manyika, J., Niebles, J. C., Shoham, Y., Wald, R., & Clark, J. (2024). Artificial intelligence index report 2024. Institute for Human-Centered AI. https://aiindex.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/HAI_AI-Index-Report-2024.pdf

76. McCormack, J., Cruz Gambardella, C., Rajcic, N., Krol, S. J., Llano, M. T., & Yang, M. (2023). Is writing prompts really making art? In C. Johnson, N. Rodríguez-Fernández, & S. M. Rebelo (Eds.), Artificial Intelligence in Music, Sound, Art and Design (pp. 196–211). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29956-8_13

77. McCormack, J., Llano, M. T., Krol, S. J., & Rajcic, N. (2024). No longer trending on artstation: prompt analysis of generative AI art (arXiv:2401.14425). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2401.14425

78. Mitchell, M. (2019). Artificial Intelligence: A Guide for Thinking Humans (1st ed.). Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

79. Moruzzi, C. (2020, July 8). Should human artists fear AI? A report on the perception of creative AI. xCoAx2020.

80. Naik, R., & Nushi, B. (2023). Social Biases through the Text-to-Image Generation Lens. Proceedings of the 2023 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, 786–808. https://doi.org/10.1145/3600211.3604711

81. Narayan, D. (2022). Platform Capitalism and Cloud Infrastructure: Theorizing a Hyper-Scalable Computing Regime. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 54(5), 911–929. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X221094028

82. Newman, M., & Cantrill, A. (2023, April 24). The Future of AI Relies on a High School Teacher’s Free Database. Bloomberg. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2023-04-24/a-high-school-teacher-s-free-image-database-powers-ai-unicorns

83. Newstead, T., Eager, B., & Wilson, S. (2023). How AI can perpetuate - or help mitigate - gender bias in leadership. In Organizational Dynamics (Vol. 52, Issue 4). ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2023.100998

84. Noever, D. A., & Noever, S. E. M. (2021). Reading Isn’t Believing: Adversarial Attacks On Multi-Modal Neurons (arXiv:2103.10480). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2103.10480

85. Noy, S., & Zhang, W. (2023). Experimental evidence on the productivity effects of generative artificial intelligence. Science, 381(6654), 187–192. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adh2586

86. NTIA. (2024). AI Accountability Policy Report. https://www.ntia.gov/sites/default/files/publications/ntia-ai-report-final.pdf

87. O’Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy (1st edition). Crown.

88. Otterbacher, J., Barlas, P., Kleanthous, S., & Kyriakou, K. (2019). How Do We Talk About Other People? Group (Un)Fairness in Natural Language Image Descriptions. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing, 7, 106–114. https://aaai.org/ojs/index.php/HCOMP/article/view/5267

89. Patton, D. U., Frey, W. R., McGregor, K. A., Lee, F.-T., McKeown, K., & Moss, E. (2020). Contextual Analysis of Social Media. Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, 337–342. https://doi.org/10.1145/3375627.3375841

90. Perrigo, B. (2023, January 18). Exclusive: The $2 Per Hour Workers Who Made ChatGPT Safer. TIME. https://time.com/6247678/openai-chatgpt-kenya-workers/

91. Petrie, H., Harrison, C., & Dev, S. (2005). Describing images on the web: a survey of current practice and prospects for the future. Proceedings of Human Computer Interaction International (HCII), 71(2), 1–10. https://www.academia.edu/download/30388620/hcii05_alt_text_paper.pdf

92. Pi, Y. (2024). Missing value chain in generative AI governance China as an example (arXiv:2401.02799). arXiv. http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.02799

93. Pilz, K., & Heim, L. (2023). Compute at Scale: A Broad Investigation into the Data Center Industry (arXiv:2311.02651). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2311.02651

94. Prabhu, V. U., & Birhane, A. (2020). Large image datasets: A pyrrhic win for computer vision? (arXiv:2006.16923). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2006.16923

95. Qadri, R., Shelby, R., Bennett, C. L., & Denton, R. (2023). AI’s regimes of representation: a community-centered study of text-to-image models in south asia. 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 506–517. https://doi.org/10.1145/3593013.3594016

96. Radford, A., Kim, J. W., Hallacy, C., Ramesh, A., Goh, G., Agarwal, S., Sastry, G., Askell, A., Mishkin, P., Clark, J., Krueger, G., & Sutskever, I. (2021). Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision (arXiv:2103.00020). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2103.00020

97. Ramesh, A., Pavlov, M., Goh, G., Gray, S., Voss, C., Radford, A., Chen, M., & Sutskever, I. (2021). Zero-Shot Text-to-Image Generation (arXiv:2102.12092). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2102.12092

98. Raymond, E. S. (2014). 大教堂与集市 (卫剑钒, Trans.). 机械工业出版社.

99. Richter, F. (2025, February 27). Amazon and Microsoft Stay Ahead in Global Cloud Market. Statista Daily Data. https://www.statista.com/chart/18819/worldwide-market-share-of-leading-cloud-infrastructure-service-providers

100. Romero, A. (2024, April 3). The state of generative AI, 2024. https://www.thealgorithmicbridge.com/p/the-state-of-generative-ai-2024

101. Roose, K. (2022, September 2). An AI generated picture won an art prize. Artists aren’t happy. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/02/technology/ai-artificial-intelligence-artists.html

102. Schaffer, S. (1994). Babbage’s Intelligence: Calculating Engines and the Factory System. Critical Inquiry, 21(1), 203–227. http://www.imaginaryfutures.net/2007/04/16/babbages-intelligence-by-simon-schaffer/. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1343892

103. Schick, N. (2023, April 24). Nina Schick: How could societies adapt to generative AI? (C. Schuhmann, Interviewer) [Interview]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9HKzZIDqX_Y

104. Schuhmann, C., Beaumont, R., Vencu, R., Gordon, C., Wightman, R., Cherti, M., Coombes, T., Katta, A., Mullis, C., Wortsman, M., Schramowski, P., Kundurthy, S., Crowson, K., Schmidt, L., Kaczmarczyk, R., & Jitsev, J. (2022). LAION-5B: An open large-scale dataset for training next generation image-text models (arXiv:2210.08402). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2210.08402

105. Schuhmann, C. (2023, June 21). AI as a Superpower: LAION and the Role of Open Source in Artificial Intelligence (devmio, Interviewer) [Interview]. https://mlconference.ai/blog/ai-as-a-superpower-laion-and-the-role-of-open-source-in-artificial-intelligence/

106. Schuhmann, C. (2023, May 1). Christoph Schuhmann on Open Source AI (A. Chan, Interviewer) [Interview]. https://theinsideview.ai/christoph

107. Selbst, A. D., Boyd, D., Friedler, S. A., Venkatasubramanian, S., & Vertesi, J. (2019). Fairness and Abstraction in Sociotechnical Systems. Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1145/3287560.3287598

108. Shankar, S., Halpern, Y., Breck, E., Atwood, J., Wilson, J., & Sculley, D. (2017). No classification without representation: assessing geodiversity issues in open data sets for the developing world (arXiv:1711.08536). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1711.08536

109. 申一方. (2023). 从亚像似符理论看人工智能艺术生成趋势. 符号与传媒, 2023(2), 162–174.

110. Smith, A., Schroeder, H., Epstein, Z., Cook, M., Colton, S., & Lippman, A. (2023). Trash to treasure: using text-to-image models to inform the design of physical artefacts (arXiv:2302.00561). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2302.00561

111. Srinivasan, R., & Chander, A. (2021). Biases in AI Systems: A survey for practitioners. Queue, 19(2), 45–64. https://doi.org/10.1145/3466132.3466134

112. Stewart, R., Andriluka, M., & Ng, A. Y. (2016). End-to-End People Detection in Crowded Scenes. 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2325–2333. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2016.255

113. Stout, K. (2025). ICLE Comments to OSTP on Development of an AI Action Plan. https://laweconcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/OSTP-AI-2025-comments-v-1.pdf

114. Sun, L., Wei, M., Sun, Y., Suh, Y. J., Shen, L., & Yang, S. (2023). Smiling Women Pitching down: Auditing Representational and Presentational Gender Biases in Image-Generative AI. In Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication (Vol. 29, Issue 1). OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmad045

115. Suresh, H., & Guttag, J. (2021). A Framework for Understanding Sources of Harm throughout the Machine Learning Life Cycle. Equity and Access in Algorithms, Mechanisms, and Optimization, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1145/3465416.3483305

116. 汤筠冰. (2024). 生成式AI影响下的艺术媒介本体论转向. 上海师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 1, 59–67.

117. Thomas, R. J., & Thomson, T. J. (2023). What does a journalist look like? Visualizing journalistic roles through AI. In DIGITAL Journalism. ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2023.2229883

118. Thompson, A. D. (2022). What’s in my AI? A Comprehensive Analysis of Datasets Used to Train GPT-1, GPT-2, GPT-3, GPT-NeoX-20B, Megatron-11B, MT-NLG, and Gopher. https://lifearchitect.ai/whats-in-my-ai/

119. Thylstrup, N. B. (2022). The ethics and politics of data sets in the age of machine learning: deleting traces and encountering remains. Media, Culture & Society, 44(4), 655–671. https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437211060226

120. Torralba, A., Fergus, R., & Freeman, W. T. (2008). 80 Million Tiny Images: A Large Data Set for Nonparametric Object and Scene Recognition. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 30(11), 1958–1970. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2008.128

121. Tufano, M., Agarwal, A., Jang, J., Moghaddam, R. Z., & Sundaresan, N. (2024). AutoDev: Automated AI-Driven Development (arXiv:2403.08299). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2403.08299

122. Turk, V. (2023, October 10). How AI reduces the world to stereotypes. Rest of World. https://restofworld.org/2023/ai-image-stereotypes/

123. Turkle, S. (2017). Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. Basic Books.

124. Valyaeva, A. (2023, August 15). AI image statistics: how much content was created by AI. Everypixel Journal. https://journal.everypixel.com/ai-image-statistics

125. Van Der Vlist, F., Helmond, A., & Ferrari, F. (2024). Big AI: Cloud infrastructure dependence and the industrialisation of artificial intelligence. Big Data & Society, 11(1), 20539517241232630. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517241232630

126. Vipra, J., & West, S. M. (2023). Computational Power and AI. AI Now Institute. https://ainowinstitute.org/publication/policy/compute-and-ai

127. Wang, Q., Bian, T., Yin, Y., Xu, T., Cheng, H., Meng, H. M., Zheng, Z., Chen, L., & Wu, B. (2023). Language agents for detecting implicit stereotypes in text-to-image models at scale (arXiv:2310.11778). arXiv. http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.11778

128. Widder, D. G., West, S., & Whittaker, M. (2023). Open (For Business): Big Tech, Concentrated Power, and the Political Economy of Open AI (28 citation(s); SSRN Scholarly Paper 4543807). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4543807

129. Williams, S. (2015). 若为自由故：自由软件之父理查德·斯托曼传 (邓楠 & 李凡希, Trans.). 人民邮电出版社.

130. Wojtkiewicz, K. (2023). How do you solve a problem like DALL-E 2? The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 81(4), 454–467. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaac/kpad046

131. Wolfe, R., & Caliskan, A. (2022). American == White in Multimodal Language-and-Image AI. Proceedings of the 2022 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, 800–812. https://doi.org/10.1145/3514094.3534136

132. Wu, D., Yu, Z., Ma, N., Jiang, J., Wang, Y., Zhou, G., Deng, H., & Li, Y. (2023). StyleMe: towards intelligent fashion generation with designer style. Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581377

133. Xu, J., Li, H., & Zhou, S. (2015). An overview of deep generative models. IETE Technical Review, 32(2), 131–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/02564602.2014.987328

134. Zhang, B., & Carpano, D. (2023). Chromium as a tool of logistical power: A material political economy of open-source. Big Data & Society, 10(1), 20539517231182399. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517231182399

135. Zhou, J., & Guo, J. (2020). Why AI Alt Text Generator Fail. https://ecommons.cornell.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/cd4e8a1a-c42c-428b-96d4-c86da92c8dd1/content

136. Zhu, Y., Baca, J., Rekabdar, B., & Rawassizadeh, R. (2023). A Survey of AI Music Generation Tools and Models (arXiv:2308.12982). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2308.12982